tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53950224858866592762024-03-09T04:18:07.624+05:30Thoughts of a nationalist IndianDharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comBlogger93125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-28522325897640777232017-05-06T02:36:00.000+05:302017-05-06T02:36:07.557+05:30Pakistan: A State of Denial<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3IC7tEsf4t8/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3IC7tEsf4t8?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">This is a recent interview of former Pak Prez Musharraf. It was taken after the recent incident on the LoC where two Indian soldiers were found mutilated, and blood trails led back across the LoC.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">The entire interview is worth watching, because it shows the mindset and policies of the highest echelons of the Pak leadership. The one thing that stands out absolutely clearly is that Pak's official policy can be simply described in one word: DENIAL.</span><br />
<span class="fullpost"><br /></span>
<span class="fullpost">In this interview, Musharraf denies all the following:</span><br />
<span class="fullpost"><br /></span>
<span class="fullpost">1. That any Indian soldier has been mutilated, not only that, that the Pak army is even capable of such an act! He says that this is a "drama" played by the Indian government. He repeats multiple times during the interview that "no one has been beheaded."</span><br />
<span class="fullpost">2. That Hafiz Saeed is a terrorist (even when reminded that the US has placed 10M$ bounty on his head, which he explains by saying that the US "fell for Indian propaganda"!)</span><br />
<span class="fullpost">3. That the Mumbai attacks of 26/11 had anything to do with Lashkar-e-Toiba. He says that RAW used those attacks to tarnish the image of LeT!</span><br />
<span class="fullpost">4. That there is any terror that comes to Indian via Pakistan. All terrorist activity in India is "homegrown."</span><br />
<span class="fullpost">5. That there was no mutilation of Captain Sourabh Kalia or his company at all. All of that was staged by India for propaganda! </span><br />
<span class="fullpost"><br /></span>
<span class="fullpost">I would like readers to note that this man led Pakistan for 8 years. This is how the head of Pakistan thinks. Is there ANY chance of peace with such a country which simply denies everything? </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">Readers might also recall that Musharraf, when he was head of state, told an American TV channel that he thought "Bin Laden must be dead by now." A few years later, Bin Laden was found nicely accomodated in a huge bungalow in Pakistan's military town. Since he was placed there during Musharraf's reign as head of state and chief of army, it is impossible that Musharraf was not part of this cover up. This is the kind of man we are dealing with. Pakistan's military has always been headed by people like Musharraf. It is foolish to think we can do straight dealings with them. </span><br />
<span class="fullpost"><br /></span>
<span class="fullpost"><br /></span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-76424233005314026332017-04-25T20:58:00.002+05:302017-04-25T20:58:11.272+05:30Kashmir celebrates Independence day, but Pakistan's<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/CTyH6WVEEZY/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CTyH6WVEEZY?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/UA_3q0DYIvo/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UA_3q0DYIvo?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
Videos from last year's August. It is very clear that the radicalization/Jihadi-isation of valley is complete. The forces of the Caliphate---the same forces that drive ISIS and Boko Haram---are in full force in the valley. <br />
<span class="fullpost">
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-77641774742485032112017-04-14T20:54:00.003+05:302017-04-14T20:57:08.277+05:30Islamic Female Genital Mutilation Comes to America<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/04/14/us/14xp-mutilation_web1/14xp-mutilation_web1-master180.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/04/14/us/14xp-mutilation_web1/14xp-mutilation_web1-master180.jpg" /></a></div>
Female genital mutilation---a barbaric Islamic practice wherein the clitoris of a young girl is chopped off, so that she never feels any sexual pleasure ever in her life---has come to the US.
This practice is common in Islamic societies from Pakistan to Somalia. In most developed countries, it is banned, since it is so horrific and takes away a pleasure that God has intended all humans to enjoy.<br />
<br />
However, today, in a first, a Muslim woman "doctor" Jumana Nagarwala (photo attached, complete with Hijab) was caught performing this practice for fellow Muslims in Detroit, Michigan. Her victims were Muslim girls aged 6-12.<br />
<br />
About 200 million girls and women around the world have suffered some form of FGM, the UN says, with half living in Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia.<br />
<br />Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-46795313386954993292017-04-13T21:57:00.002+05:302017-04-13T21:58:54.116+05:30Religion of Peace Strikes Two Ahmadis in Pakistani UniversityTwo students of Mardan University in Pakistan were brutally lynched by a mob of fellow students (!) for "promoting Ahmadi religion on Facebook." What a huge offense in the eyes of these Muslims. The students were sought, found, forced to recite verses from Kuran, and then killed. All the while, the poor victims denied that they were Ahmadis, however that had no effect on the Muslim mob.<br />
<br />
A video of the lynching is available: warning, it is not for the faint hearted. It shows Islamic mob action in full gory detail.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sa7iqAcTdo0" width="560"></iframe><br />
<br />
Is this the famous religion of "peace" that we all know about?<br />
<br />
Is this what we want to let into our countries?<br />
<br />Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-22799560187512634812017-04-13T01:54:00.001+05:302017-04-13T01:54:32.388+05:30Kulbhushan Jadhav<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://i.dawn.com/large/2016/03/56fcd535179b6.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://i.dawn.com/large/2016/03/56fcd535179b6.jpg" height="192" width="320" /></a></div>
Many people have asked: Why did Kulbhushan Jadhav have a "fake" passport with a Muslim name if he is not a spy. The answer is not that hard, really. Jadhav has been a businessman for the past
many years (over a decade). His business is renting dhows (sort of like boats, to transport material). As such, a major source of his business would possibly be government contracts. He was working in Iran, and it is likely he was trying to obtain government contracts for his business. Iran is a Shia Islamic state. It is very beneficial to have a Shia identity to obtain such contracts. It is possible that some contracts were restricted only to Muslims, and Jadhav might have wanted to be considered even for those. For purely such business reasons, he might have had a Islamic name on an alternative passport.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://c.tribune.com.pk/2016/03/1074812-yadavx-1459231088-112-640x480.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://c.tribune.com.pk/2016/03/1074812-yadavx-1459231088-112-640x480.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
That is a very different thing than being a spy.<br />
<br />
It is very possible that there are several such Indians who ply their businesses in Iran. Pakistan's ISI probably wanted to exploit one of these---it kidnapped Jadhav from Iran, and used his Muslim identity on his business passport to further the case that "if he had a fake passport, he must be a spy." If they have any evidence at all, why has it not been made available to various governments. For example, India provided not one, not two, but seven dossiers on Ajmal Kasab to various world governments before hanging him. And mind you, Kasab was seen by millions on video carrying AK-47s in Mumbai shooting. Still, we went through with full procedure.<br />
<br />
Where is the evidence against Jadhav? Not one piece of evidence has been made public.
Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-88373650612656962052013-05-25T21:07:00.002+05:302013-05-25T21:07:50.557+05:30Jihadi Outrage in Woolwich
A british soldier was killed and almost beheaded by two muslims in Woolwich (England). The killers were Jihadis (Islam's holy warriors) who then justified their acts by quoting verses from the hate manual (a.k.a Kuran). The Kuran is mostly full of hatred towards non-muslims. It is no surprise that when a person gets a dose of its hatred, the person starts to behave with irrational hatred and violence towards non-muslims.
To my British readers: we Hindus are with you in your loss. Every week Hindu soldiers are killed in our own country, either by muslims born here, or those sent by Pakistan across the border. Read for instance
<a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shocked-villagers-mourn-as-2-beheaded-indian-soldiers-bodies-return-in-coffins/1056901/">
about two of our soldiers who were beheaded by Pakistani jihadis</a>
on our side of the border.
We must fight Islam together. We must call it for what it is: a force of pure hatred and evil.
Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-39273241989119263402013-04-26T09:39:00.002+05:302013-04-26T09:39:39.433+05:30The Extent to which Muslims Go.....A Hindu student at Brown University, who had been missing since March, and who, tragically, has been found deceased yesterday, was DELIBERATELY made the target of a malicious twitter campaign by,..., no prizes for guess...you guessed it...muslims.<br />
<br />
These sick people tried to tie Sunil to the Boston bombing. The lengths to which these people go.<br />
<br />
I am glad Sunil's name has been cleared. I am also very sad that he is no more. May he rest in peace. <br />
<br />
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/0425/Sunil-Tripathi-body-found-Brown-student-was-misidentified-in-Boston-bombing<br />
<span class="fullpost">
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-91570136654223125832013-04-26T08:54:00.002+05:302013-04-26T08:54:43.960+05:30To my American Readers<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">We are with you. And all of us as GLAD you caught those bastards. Give 'em hell!</span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">And when these things happen to us, remember who your friends are (hint: it's not those guys who hid Bin Laden 800 feet from their West Point).</span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">Its us against Islam, and you better believe it. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost"> </span><br />
Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-24506843042934832762013-04-26T08:49:00.001+05:302013-04-26T08:49:57.266+05:30The Hell of Being a Hindu in Dar-ul-IslamIslam is the only "religion" (read death-cult) that actually has a strict set of laws in its Kuran-Hadith hate-literature that specifies how non-muslims are to be treated once muslims form an Islamic society. In two words "like shit."<br />
<br />
A few days back, another batch of helpless Hindus from Pakistan arrived in India. They describe their ordeal. Their daughters are routinely grabbed at gunpoint, converted to Islam, and married to muslim men. Oh, btw, they are only emulating the behaviour of their "prophet", so don't blame them.<br />
<a href="http://www.dailypioneer.com/todays-newspaper/life-in-pak-not-worth-it-say-sindh-hindus.html">
<b> </b></a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailypioneer.com/todays-newspaper/life-in-pak-not-worth-it-say-sindh-hindus.html"><b>Life in Pak not worth it, say Sindh Hindus</b></a><br />
<br />
<b>URL: http://www.dailypioneer.com/todays-newspaper/life-in-pak-not-worth-it-say-sindh-hindus.html </b><br />
<br />
<br />
Excerpt: Recalling a horrific incident that took place recently, a weeping Lakshmi said: “It was evening time and four Muslim men barged into my friend and neighbour’s house as they wanted to kidnap her 12-year-old daughter. When the girl’s mother and I resisted, they put a gun to our heads and threatened to kill us if we did not let go of the child. Then they did what they had to do. We were helpless.”
Read the full article on the Daily Pioneer by clicking on the link or copy-pasting the URL. Please send to all humans---by that I mean anyone that feels the pain of a mother and father who have to see their 12 year old daughter being taken away, into a life of Islamic slavery, by gun-toting muslims (who are only following their prophet's example).<br />
<br />
Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-43819851750575395952012-03-29T03:59:00.000+05:302012-03-29T03:59:56.071+05:30IN MEMORY OF FAKHRA YUNUShttp://abcnews.go.com/Health/victim-acid-attack-commits-suicide/story?id=16011971#.T3OOKhhsCEI<br />
<br />
<br />
Let us all honour her memory, and pray for her peace. Always remember: women are Islam's first victims. Islam is a male-dominated cult. As such, it views women (both its own, and those of the kafirs) as not much more than property of men. And when men are raised in such an environment, they cannot countenance their "property" speaking back to them, defying them, asserting itself. When they see this, they react in the manner that Fakhra Yunus experienced. <br />
<br />
For an hour or so after I read the story of Fakhra, I was truly numb. Then I thought that the least I can do is post this blog in her memory. Fakhra, you were truly brave. You will not be forgotten. You rose above that society that did this to you, and you became immortal. Your pain and suffering will not be in vain. May you rest in peace in those higher abodes where none of the suffering that you experienced in this life will follow. <br />
<br />
As a mark of respect, I am not posting any pictures on this article. Readers of this blog will remember Fakhra as a young, extremely beautiful woman, full of life and spirit.Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-32542339200892523372012-03-07T09:43:00.000+05:302012-03-07T09:43:36.079+05:30Another young Hindu girl abducted, converted in PakistanIn the past few months alone, 96 Hindus, mostly young girls, have been abducted in muslim Pakistan, converted, and married to local muslim boys. The latest is a 17 year old girl called Rinkle Kumari. Her story has also been carried by the BBC, which you can read here<br />
<br />
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-17272943<br />
<br />
But the best coverage is by the blogger Hindu existence. Please read the story (with more pictures) here:<br />
http://hinduexistence.wordpress.com/<br />
<br />
Look at the photograph of poor young Rinkle covered in an Islamic burkha. <br />
<br />
If you are ANY human being, and your blood does not boil when you read this, then there is something seriously wrong. <br />
<br />
Islam is dangerous. It pretends to be all nice and "beautiful" while they are in a small minority. Once they are in majority, the first thing that happens, always, is that Kafir women start "disappearing". <br />
<br />
The time to stop Islam is NOW!! Please do not delay in your own conviction, and your own action. We must all unite and stop Islam. <br />
<br />
I ask all my readers: please forward news about this young girl Rinkle to at least one other person. I don't care if you forward my blog link,or the BBC link, or whatever, just do it. That is the least we can do. <br />
<br />
To my American readers: these Pakistanis are the same ungrateful people who hid Osama in their backyard, all the while fooling you with canards such as "he has kidney failure, he is probably dead by now" etc. To my British readers: we are in this together. These are the same people who were running a flesh ring with young British girls in Britain! Unless we stop looking the other way, Islam will continue victimizing young "Kafir" women.Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-44859187454512786492010-11-23T07:50:00.000+05:302010-11-23T07:50:35.262+05:30"Allah": Mohammed's Ventriloquist Dummy<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/B4od-Z3r7ko?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B4od-Z3r7ko?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object><br />
<br />
When I began studying Islam about 10 years ago, I did so with the honest intent of finding something spiritual there. As a devout Hindu, I believe that no one path can lay exclusive claim to the truth, and that the search for truth is ever ongoing. In that spirit, I wished to read about other religions as well. <br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost"><br />
What I found was that Islam is not exactly a religion in the way we understand it. It is a political system that was invented by one man - Mohammed. Why did he claim it was a religion (and all that baloney about being in touch with "Allah")? Upon a careful reading of the Kuran and Hadith, it becomes clear that Mohammed was like any other charlatan claiming an exclusive relationship with God. He was neither the first charlatan to claim this, nor the last. In the past few decades itself, we saw many "mini-Mohammeds". There was this guy called David Koresh in Texas (USA) who made similar claims. He too was having sexual relationships with many women, including several very young women. The only difference between him and Mohammed is that he (David Koresh) lived in an age where he could not get away with it. The FBI attacked his compound where he was practising Mohammed-like things, and he was killed. In Mohammed's time, a few desperadoes could impose this new "religion" called Islam upon many unsuspecting arabs, at the threat of death. That is the ONLY difference between these two charlatans.<br />
<br />
Anyway, when you view this video, keep in mind one thing. Would God - who has the entire universe to worry about - be bothered to send verse after verse covering for Mohammed's sexual misdeeds? Would God send verses allowing Mohammed to bed any "believing woman who offers herself", and at the same time threaten Mohammed's wives with dire consequences if they indulged in adultery? What kind of "God" is this Allah, anyway? The answer is - Allah is not God. Allah is just the ventriloquist dummy of a charlatan named Mohammed. You see, this charlatan never had any spiritual experiences. He made up this whole act. It is absolutely clear that this is the case when you read the Kuran and Hadith. <br />
<br />
The happy ending for Mohammed was that he had a LOT of sex (66 women in total, not bad for a bedouin camel hearder), and a LOT of power. His henchmen murdered men and women who so much as uttered any doubt about Mohammed's "prophethood." <br />
<br />
Anyway, enjoy the video.<br />
<br />
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-38338708077993297072010-11-22T10:20:00.001+05:302010-11-22T10:40:44.580+05:30Mohammed's Obsession with FartingIn <a href="http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2009/02/is-this-islamic-spirituality.html">another post</a>, we have seen how the "prophet" Mohammed was obsessed with the most trite of things. He liked to give lessons on how to urinate (sitting or standing), for example. This should not surprise anyone. Islam is a total mind control cult, and such cults always try to control every little detail of a person's life, thereby turning the person into an automaton who will do whatever the cult leader (Mohammed) wants without questioning. <br />
<span class="fullpost"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="fullpost">Anyway, let us observe this phenomenon again. In this case, Mohammed spends Hadith after Hadith on the profound issue of farting. I kid you not. I will reproduce the Hadith, from no less a Hadith collection than Sahih Bukhari - the most reliable Hadith collection. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">Let us start. </span><br />
<blockquote><span class="fullpost"><br />
</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=5395022485886659276" name="001.004.137"><i>Volume 1, Book 4, Number 137: </i></a><br />
Narrated Abu Huraira: <br />
Allah's Apostle said, "The prayer of a person who does ,Hadath (passes, urine, stool or wind) is not accepted till he performs (repeats) the ablution." A person from Hadaramout asked Abu Huraira, "What is 'Hadath'?" Abu Huraira replied, "<i> 'Hadath' means the passing of wind from the anus." </i></blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
So it seems that farting renders a muslim's prayer null and void. Let us continue.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><blockquote><br />
<div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=5395022485886659276" name="001.004.139"><i>Volume 1, Book 4, Number 139: </i></a></div>Narrated 'Abbas bin Tamim: <br />
My uncle asked Allah's Apostle about a person who imagined to have passed wind during the prayer. Allah' Apostle replied: "He should not leave his prayers unless he hears sound or <i>smells something.</i>" </blockquote><br />
So one should constantly apply the smell test during prayer to ensure that other muslims are not farting!<br />
<blockquote><br />
<div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=5395022485886659276" name="001.008.436"><i>Volume 1, Book 8, Number 436: </i></a></div>Narrated Abu Huraira: <br />
Allah's Apostle said, "The angels keep on asking Allah's forgiveness for anyone of you, as long as he is at his Mu,salla (praying place) <i>and he does not pass wind </i>(Hadath). They say, 'O Allah! Forgive him, O Allah! be Merciful to him." </blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal">Allah forgives you only if you don't fart! Otherwise boy, are you in some trouble with Allah :-) </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=5395022485886659276" name="009.086.086"><i>Volume 9, Book 86, Number 86: </i></a></div>Narrated Abu Huraira: <br />
The Prophet said, "<i>Allah does not accept prayer of anyone of you if he does Hadath (passes wind) </i>till he performs the ablution (anew)." </blockquote><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">Allah seems to care more about whether you farted or not during prayer than anything more substantial (for example, whether your mind was truly pure or not during prayer). </div><div class="MsoNormal"></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
<br />
Reading the Hadith convinced me of one thing - Islam is simply not a religion. It has no spiritual core. It is just the nonsensical, hateful, and sexist ramblings of a semi-illiterate 7th century bedouin who used the oldest trick in the book to get the power and <a href="http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2010/11/mohammed-prophet-or-sex-maniac.html">women</a> that he would never have had otherwise. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-85065985181645025712010-11-18T09:20:00.000+05:302010-11-18T09:20:35.803+05:30Are muslims "Indians first" or "muslims first"?<span class="fullpost">Those who have no understanding of Islam keep asserting that muslims and Hindus both can and should be Indians first. Indeed, most Hindus would not disagree with being Indians first. But what about muslims? Islam does not permit allegiance to any state besides an Islamic state. Indeed, it makes it the duty of all muslims to try and convert their existing state into an Islamic state, by means of war or any other means at their disposal. Islam permits allegiance only to the muslim "ummah", nothing else. </span><br />
<span class="fullpost"> </span><br />
<span class="fullpost">I found a very clear statement to this effect in the readers comments section of the following news:</span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/Khamenei-urges-Muslims-to-help-Kashmir/articleshow/6935375.cms </span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">I reproduce below the muslim reader's comment. </span><br />
<span class="fullpost"><br />
</span><br />
<blockquote><div><div style="background-color: transparent; border: medium none; color: black; overflow: hidden; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;"><span class="name">Londoner</span> <span class="location">(London)</span> <br />
<span id="dtfrmt2468251">5 hrs ago (03:44 AM)</span><br />
<span style="clear: both; color: black; display: block; padding-top: 7px;">I see many posts asking Muslims whether they are Indians/nationalist first or Muslims. Let me clarify this for everyones sake. Muslims are Muslims first. No matter in which part of world they are putting up. "There is no concept of nationalism in Islam" period. Islam does not believe in dividing people in the name of natons, colors, sects etc. Everyone deserves equal treatment. Black can stand shoulder to shoulder with white to offer prayers in same Masjid. Can eat together on same dasterkhwaan(dining mat). No one is superior/inferior. Thats is the reason why there used to be 1 Khalifa for all 47 Islamic countries prior to WWII. To breakdown the overall strength and unity of Muslims, imperialists/zionists launched nationalism propaganda as a result of which last Khalifa empire - Ottoman emipre came to an end. But inshallah the time will come soon when we have one nation one Khalifa.</span></div></div></blockquote><span style="clear: both; color: black; display: block; padding-top: 7px;"></span><span style="clear: both; color: black; display: block; padding-top: 7px;"> </span><span style="clear: both; color: black; display: block; padding-top: 7px;">I ask my Hindu readers to stop their idiotic insistence that Islam behave in a "secular manner." India's secularism is a sham upon Hindus only. It is a one way street, with Hindus asked to completely deracinate themselves, deny their Hinduness, while the other side is not only encouraged to assert their Islamic identity, but even pampered when they do so. Wasn't it our Prime Minister who recently said that "Muslims have the first right to India's resources." Can you imagine what a furore it would cause if an Indian PM had said "Hindus have the first right to India's resources." And can you even imagine a muslim PM in a muslim country saying about any minority group that it had the first rights to that country's resources? </span><span style="clear: both; color: black; display: block; padding-top: 7px;"> </span><span style="clear: both; color: black; display: block; padding-top: 7px;">Hindus are living in fool's paradise. Muslims (as a community) are living by their Kuran. Sure, there are exceptions, but as a community we should not expect them to suddenly forsake the primary diktats of their religion and say "muslim-kafir bhai bhai." </span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-50217612127404888432010-11-10T09:26:00.008+05:302010-11-22T10:41:18.826+05:30Mohammed: The Debauched "Prophet"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/mohammed-sex3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="219" src="http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/mohammed-sex3.jpg" width="320" /></a></div> (Description of Mohammed's libido in Hadith Sahih Bukhari. Image courtesy <a href="http://sheikyermami.com/">sheikyermami.com</a>)<br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">The licentious and depraved sexual behaviour of the "prophet of Islam" is a matter that shames many muslims (those that are aware of it - many are not). This blog post is about a courageous publisher who was killed for the "blasphemous act" of simply reproducing Hadith that describe this shocking sexual depravity by the "prophet" of Islam. <br />
<br />
In 1927, a Hindu (Arya Samaji) publisher named Raj Pal published a book titled "Rangeela Rasul" (the debauched prophet) in the Punjab province of the then undivided India. The book contained material from the Hadith, Sira, Tabari etc. (all Islamic sources) that showed just what kind of sexual licentiousness Islam's founder indulged in. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">At that time, Punjab had a muslim majority population, and Raj Pal's act was indeed a very courageous and daring one. As per all schools of Islam, the punishment for a person who insults the Prophet Mohammed is death. Accordingly, many attempts were made on his life by practicing muslims, and after many such failed attempts, he was murdered by a practicing muslim named Ilm Din in 1929. Ilm Din, through this act of murder in accordance with Islamic tradition, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi_Ilm-ud-din_Shaheed">became a hero to fellow muslims, and a "ghazi" (a killer of Kafirs)</a>. <br />
<br />
(This preceded the similar murder of Theo Van Gogh in the Netherlands by several decades.)</span><br />
<br />
Many instances of Mohammed's debauched behaviour are described in the book. <br />
In <a href="http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2010/11/islams-perfect-man-mohammed-torturer.html">another post</a>, we have already discussed the "prophet" Mohammed's proclivity to kill men and rape their wives (sometimes on that very day). There is much more evidence in the Hadith and Sira that Mohammed was quite a sex maniac. Not only did he go on a marrying spree after this wealthy and influential first wife Khadija died, he acquired many sexual slaves (concubines) through the numerous Jihads on the hapless polytheists and jews of arabia. <br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost"><br />
What did he do with his "stable" of wives and concubines? The Hadith record his sexual acts with quite some pride. I reproduce some of the relevant Hadith below. All are from Hadith Sahih Bukhari - considered the <a href="http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/sbtintro.html">most authentic and reliable Hadith collection</a>. They describe what we could refer to as Mohammed's "sexual olympics". <br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268: <br />
Narrated Qatada: <br />
<br />
Anas bin Malik said, "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, <b>"Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men)." <i></i></b>And Sa'id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven). </blockquote><br />
Note the pride with which the early muslims viewed their "prophet's" sexual prowess. It also speaks volumes about the kind of people who had gathered around Mohammed. Most decent people would view this kind of behavior (not to mention the very fact of having so many wives) with some disgust. But not the early muslims. Why? Reading the Hadith and Sira, it becomes quite clear that the people who had gathered around Mohammed were largely the scoundrels of arab society. Many had been drawn by the lure of war booty and sexual slaves that Mohammed would pass them after his raids on polytheists and jews. Just like criminals often rave about how bloodthirsty their godfather is, the early muslims raved about their "prophet's" sexual prowess. Read on.<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 5, Number 270: <br />
Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Muntathir: <br />
<br />
on the authority of his father that he had asked 'Aisha about the saying of Ibn 'Umar(i.e. he did not like to be a Muhrim while the smell of scent was still coming from his body). 'Aisha said, <i>"I scented Allah's Apostle and he went round (had sexual intercourse with) all his wives,</i> and in the morning he was Muhrim (after taking a bath)." </blockquote><br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 5, Number 282: <br />
Narrated Anas bin Malik: <br />
<br />
The Prophet used to <i>visit all his wives in one night</i><b><i> </i></b>and he had nine wives at that time. </blockquote><br />
<br />
It seems Mohammed and Aisha were quite the steamy couple. Try hard as she might, she could not get his semen off his clothes. Read on.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229: <br />
Narrated 'Aisha: <br />
<br />
I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible). </blockquote><br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231: <br />
Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar: <br />
<br />
I asked 'Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. " </blockquote><br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232: <br />
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun: <br />
<br />
I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that 'Aisha had said, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them. </blockquote><br />
<br />
<blockquote>Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233: <br />
Narrated 'Aisha: <br />
<br />
I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them. </blockquote><br />
Once again, I ask readers to verify every single Hadith for themselves. I have taken all I am not making up a single word in any of the above. </span><br />
<span class="fullpost"></span><br />
<br />
<span class="fullpost">Next we come to the "prophet's" behaviour towards his stable of women when they were having their menstrual period. I reproduce the relevant Hadith, again only from Sahih Bukhari.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5395022485886659276&postID=5021761212740488843" name="001.006.298"><i><span style="font-style: normal;">Volume 1, Book 6, Number 298: </span></i></a></div>Narrated 'Aisha: <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) <i>and used to fondle me.</i> While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses). </div></blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5395022485886659276&postID=5021761212740488843" name="001.006.299"><i><span style="font-style: normal;">Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299: </span></i></a></div>Narrated 'Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad: <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">(on the authority of his father) 'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), <i>he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her.</i>" 'Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could." </div></blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><blockquote><div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5395022485886659276&postID=5021761212740488843" name="001.006.300"><i><span style="font-style: normal;">Volume 1, Book 6, Number 300: </span></i></a></div>Narrated Maimuna: <br />
<i>When ever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle any of his wives during the periods (menses)</i>, he used to ask her to wear an Izar. </blockquote><div class="MsoNormal">When reading these Hadith, I remind the reader that Mohammed was at least 54 years old at the time he performed these sexual acts. Remember, he was 54 at the time of his marriage to the 6 year old Aisha. What a disgusting old bedouin. <br />
<span class="fullpost"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span class="fullpost">If one looks at the sum total of all original Islamic literature, one finds an astounding 66 women who had sexual encounters with this "prophet" of debauchery. It is no wonder that Islamic clerics try so hard to hide the truth about Mohammed behind a well constructed barricade of lies and deception. However, one only has to read the Hadith and Sira for themselves in order to see the truth about this man - without doubt the greatest charlatan the world has ever seen. And one heck of a hyper-sexual bedouin. </span></div><span class="fullpost"></span><br />
<span class="fullpost"></span><br />
<span class="fullpost"> <br />
Dedication: <i>I dedicate this blog post to the courageous Shri Raj Pal, and the author of the book Shri Chamupati. You can download the book Rangeela Rasul in Hindi <a href="http://cdn.agniveer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/RangeelaRasul1.pdf">here</a>. <br />
</i><br />
<br />
<br />
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-69000494021084158362010-11-02T10:20:00.007+05:302010-11-02T10:43:20.628+05:30Islam's "perfect man" Mohammed: A torturer and a rapist<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.voicesunveiled.com/images/page/harem.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" nx="true" src="http://www.voicesunveiled.com/images/page/harem.jpg" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">(An Islamic slave market in the time of Mohammed, where women were traded like animals, usually after being raped by the muslim soldiers who had "captured" them.) </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Islam is the religion of Mohammed. According to Islam, Mohammed is the "perfect man" (Insaan-e-Kaamil) and the "perfect example for all mankind for all time." His behaviour is the ideal behaviour, and most of Islamic law (shari'a) is based on his recorded acts and words in the Hadith and Sira (his biography). </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">So what kind of a man was this "perfect man?" To answer this question, we must read the Hadith and the Sira, which record even trite details of his life in quite some detail. I started this process about 10 years back. I must confess that I was not at all prepared for what I read. Page after page of the Hadith and Sira show Mohammed to be the following:</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">1. A rapist</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">2. An extremely cruel man, capable of hideous punishments</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">3. A mass murderer</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">4. A liar</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">5. An adulterer </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">6. A child abuser</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">I will reproduce passages from the Sira and the Hadith to prove charges 1 and 2. The following are descriptions of Mohammed's raid on the Jewish fortress of Khaybar, in 628AD. This was one of the 27 military expeditions (Raziyas) that Mohammed himself led. The story of each one is roughly as follows: a group of "unbelievers" is attacked, without any reason, the men are killed, women and children are "distributed" among the muslim soldiers, with Mohammed keeping the best for himself. Let us see this pattern in the Khaybar raid. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Mohammed had hoped to obtain much wealth by killing the jews of Khaybar and looting their wealth. After Khaybar had fallen, he first orders the treasurer of the tribe to be tortured so that he may reveal where the tribe's treasure is hidden. This is page 515 of the Sira.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"></span><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: Calibri;">"Kinana al-Rabi, who had the custody of the treasure of Banu Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came, to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" He said "Yes". The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr Al-Awwam, <strong><u>"Torture him until you extract what he has."</u></strong> So he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and <strong>he struck off his head,</strong> in revenge for his brother Mahmud."</span></blockquote></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">So as you can see, Islam's "perfect man" was a torturer and a robber. A man who attacked tribes to loot their wealth. But wait, there is a happy ending here. You see, Kinana had a very beautiful wife named Safiya, who was 17 years old. We know that Mohammed liked them young. So you can guess what happens next. It is recorded both in the Hadith (which I reproduce below) and the Sira (which follows). First the Hadith, from Sahih Bukhari. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">Volume 4, Book 52, Number 143</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"></span><br />
<blockquote><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Narrated Anas bin Malik: </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The Prophet said to Abu Talha, "Choose one of your boy servants to serve me in my expedition to Khaibar." So, Abu Talha took me letting me ride behind him while I was a boy nearing the age of puberty. I used to serve Allah's Apostle when he stopped to rest. I heard him saying repeatedly, "O Allah! I seek refuge with You from distress and sorrow, from helplessness and laziness, from miserliness and cowardice, from being heavily in debt and from being overcome by men." Then we reached Khaibar; and when Allah enabled him to conquer the Fort (of Khaibar), <strong><em>the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was described to him. Her husband had been killed while she was a bride. So Allah's Apostle selected her for himself and took her along with him.</em></strong></span></div></blockquote></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The Sira also records this. Let us read it next. This is on p. 516. Remember that Mohammed has just tortured this girl's husband to death. Now let us see what he does with her. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"></span><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: Calibri;">When the apostle married Safiya in Khaybar or on the way, <strong><em>she having been beautified and combed, and got in a fit state for the apostle</em></strong> by Umm Sulaym d. Milhan mother of Anas b. Malik, the apostle passed the night with her in a tent of his. </span></blockquote></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Just imagine this - a poor 17 year old girl's husband has just been tortured to death for treasure by this bandit Mohammed. In the battle earlier in the day, the girl's father, brother, and tribesman have been killed. And now she is being "beautified" for his carnal pleasure. If a person has any decency within him, he would want to cry at this. But remember, this was the norm for women whose menfolk fell to Islam's sword. They were "beautified" and raped. Throughout the muslim conquest of India, this pattern is repeated and described in much detail. I will post some of those historical records in other posts. Let us return to Safiya. We are now on p. 517 of the Sira. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"></span><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Abu Ayyub, Khalid b. Zayd brother of B. al-Najjar passed the night girt with his sword, guarding the apostle and going round the tent until in the morning the apostle saw him and asked him what he meant by his action. He replied, ‘I was afraid for you with this woman <strong><em><u>for you have killed her father, her husband, and her people</u>, and till recently she was in unbelief, so I was afraid for you on her account.’</em></strong> They allege that the apostle said ‘O God, preserve Abu Ayyub as he spent the night preserving me.’</span></blockquote></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">So Mohammed rapes Safiya the same night he has murdered her husband, father, brothers, while his henchman guards the tent. This is Islam's "perfect man."</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">I end with one question to my readers: what kind of ideology (please, let us not call it a religion) can a man of this demonic nature invent? </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">The answer is "Islam."</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><br />
</div>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-50966648769467108102010-10-29T09:21:00.001+05:302010-11-10T12:02:07.272+05:30Status of Hindus under Islamic rule<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Sultan-Allahudeen-Gherzai.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" nx="true" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Sultan-Allahudeen-Gherzai.jpg" width="210" /></a></div>Ala-ud-din Khilji can justly be called the first muslim ruler of a large part of India. Till his reign, Islamic rule only extended in a corridor starting from Delhi, and entering today's UP and parts of Bihar. Of course, Islamic rulers continually attacked and ravaged lands outside this region as well, but were not able to establish any sort of consistent rule there. Hindu counter-offensives would often sieze back land lost to Islam within months, if not weeks. This see-saw was witnessed in large parts of north-central India. Anyway, back to Ala-ud-din. His history is recorded in some detail by Ziaundin Barani's Tarikh-i-Firuz Shahi. I reproduce the piece of the history that deals with Ala-ud-din's treatment of Hindus who had fallen into his subjecthood.<br />
<span class="fullpost"><br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>'Aláu-d dín was a king who had no acquaintance with learning, and never associated with the learned. When he became king, he came to the conclusion that polity and government are one thing, and the rules and decrees of law are another. Royal commands belong to the king, legal decrees rest upon the judgment of <i>kázís</i> and <i>muftís</i>. </blockquote>Notice that as a "good muslim ruler", he consults the kazis and muftis (Islamic holy men) for guidance on what the Kuran and Hadith command a muslim ruler to do as regards his kafir subjects.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Kází Mughísu-d dín, of Bayánah, used to go to court and sit down in private audience with the <i>amírs</i>. One day, when the efforts were being made for the increase of the tribute and of the fines and imposts, the Sultán told the <i>Kází</i> that he had several questions to ask him, and desired him to speak the plain truth. The <i>Kází</i> then promised to answer in accordance with what he had read in books. </blockquote>The learned kazi assures Ala-ud-din that he will instruct him as per Islamic law (namely, the Kuran, Hadith, and Sira). Now let us see what these say about how Hindus are to be treated. <br />
<br />
<blockquote>The Sultán then asked, “How are Hindus designated in the law, as payers of tribute (<i>kharáj-guzár</i>) or givers of tribute (<i>kharáj-dih</i>)?” The <i>Kází</i> replied, “They are called payers of tribute, and when the revenue officer demands silver from them, they should, without question and with all humility and respect, tender gold. <strong><em>If the officer throws dirt into their mouths, they must without reluctance open their mouths wide to receive it.</em></strong> By doing so they show their respect for the officer. The due subordination of the <i>zimmí</i> (tribute-payer) is exhibited in this humble payment and by this throwing of dirt into their mouths. The glorification of Islám is a duty, and contempt of the Religion is vain. God holds them in contempt, for he says, ‘Keep them under in subjection.’ <strong><em>To keep the Hindus in abasement is especially a religious duty, because they are the most inveterate enemies of the Prophet, and because the Prophet has commanded us to slay them, plunder them, and make them captive, saying, ‘Convert them to Islám or kill them, enslave them and spoil their wealth and property.’ No doctor but the great doctor (Hanífa), to whose school we belong, has assented to the imposition of the jizya (poll tax) on Hindus. Doctors of other schools allow no other alternative but ‘Death or Islám.’”</em></strong></blockquote>As I have stated in this blog repeatedly, of the 4 schools of Islamic law, only one (Hanafi) even allows Hindus the right to live. The 3 others simply say that Hindus must be killed if they refuse to convert. That is what this Kazi is telling Ala-ud-din. Note also that he says that Hindus are the worst in the eyes of Allah. This is because in the Kuran, the mushriqs (idolators) are considered the worst of the worst, fit to be killed immediately. Kuran 9:5 is very explicit about this "slay the idolators where ever ye find them..." We Hindus must never forget this - that our fate as per orthodox Islam is beheading. <br />
<br />
<blockquote>Now you tell me that it is all in accordance with law that the Hindus should be reduced to the most abject obedience.” Then the Sul-tán said, “Oh, doctor, thou art a learned man, but thou hast had no experience; I am an unlettered man, but I have seen a great deal; <strong><em>be assured then that the Hindus will never become submissive and obedient till they are reduced to poverty.</em></strong> I have, therefore, given orders that just sufficient shall be left to them from year to year, of corn, milk, and curds, but that they shall not be allowed to accumulate hoards and property.”</blockquote><br />
So Ala-ud-din says that he has put into place measures (heavy taxation etc.) in order to reduce Hindus to abject poverty and keep them in a state of permanent debasement. <br />
<br />
This was the status of Hindus under Islamic rule. Of course, our school textbooks, written by Marxist liars, will portray this period as a "great flowering of a syncretic culture." I leave it to the reader to judge for themselves what kind of "syncretic culture" our textbooks are talking about.<br />
<br />
<br />
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-85200380587758575372010-10-28T08:32:00.001+05:302010-11-10T12:05:36.398+05:30The Hindu temples that were destroyed<object height="385" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9boecZ4VjOs?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9boecZ4VjOs?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Robert Spencer - author of several books on Islam - calls it like it is. Go to 11:26 of this video where he talks about the thousands of Hindu temples destroyed by Islam, and replaced by mosques. The two books by Sri Sita Ram Goel that he refers to in his lecture are "Hindu temples - What happened to them?", parts I and II. They can be read online here:<br />
<span class="fullpost"><br />
<br />
http://www.voi.org/books/htemples1/<br />
http://www.voi.org/books/htemples2/<br />
<br />
Just the "cut and paste"s of the various muslim historians boasting about so-and-so Hindu temple has been destroyed, and converted into a mosque runs into 170 pages! <br />
<br />
The point of this post is this: An honest intellectual (Robert Spencer), speaking in the United States of America, thousands of miles away, says it like it is. But our own Marxist "historians" spend their entire lives fabricating fairy tales about a "golden period of Islamic India", deliberately suppressing the page after page of Islamic evidence of their deeds aimed at the total destruction of Hindu civilization. Just how criminal is that?<br />
<br />
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-30806893210338811662010-10-28T08:00:00.002+05:302010-11-10T12:07:47.661+05:30No mosque at ground zeroThis blog expresses its opposition to the construction of a mosque (or "Islamic center", or whatever else they wish to call it) at ground zero. For the following simple reason. The 3000+ Americans who were murdered by the hijackers of the planes that flew into the world trade center were murdered IN THE NAME OF ISLAM. The hijackers were devout muslims, acting in the name of Islam. I believe they even yelled "Allah-o-akbar" as the planes flew into the WTC.<br />
<br />
Whatever be the other debates around the topic, there can be no doubt about this fact: the murderers claimed to be doing their evil deeds in the name of Islam.<br />
<br />
This should be reason enough to not even consider building any Islamic building there. Doing so would be the greatest insult to those innocent Americans who died there.<br />
<span class="fullpost">We support America in its struggle against Jihad. In return, we ask America to support us in our 1400 year old struggle against the SAME Jihad. Jihad is Jihad - it is the doctrine Mohammed invented in order to subjugate "infidels" and loot their property and rape their women. It is as simple as that. Any attempts to obfuscate this plain fact (by calling it "inner struggle" or whatever else) is simply an insult to our intelligence. There are entire chapters in the Hadith asking muslims to get on their horses with their swords and kill infidels in the name of Jihad.<br />
<br />
Building an Islamic center at ground zero is part of that Jihad. This blog calls it for what it is and opposes it.<br />
To our American friends - we are in a war together. The sooner we realize this, the better for both of us.<br />
<br />
</span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-24223500313269712512010-02-08T11:40:00.006+05:302009-02-27T20:36:01.374+05:30Why this blog?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.mystiqueancientart.com/images/angkor_wat.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 580px; height: 350px;" src="http://www.mystiqueancientart.com/images/angkor_wat.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><span style="font-style:italic;"><br />(A picture of <a href="http://www.hinduwisdom.info/articles_hinduism/18.htm">Angkor Wat</a> - the great Hindu temple complex in Cambodia. There were many such great temple complexes in North India - all were destroyed by Islam, and this fact gleefully recorded by Islamic historians. Hindu temples have been a target for Islam since 712AD, and continue to be so with Jihadi attacks on temple complexes such as Akshardham in 2005. The first destructions of temples by Islam began with Muhammad when he destroyed the idols of over 300 Meccan deities in the Kaaba, and claimed the site for Islam alone. Around the same time, he "revealed" Sura 9:5 of the Kuran:<br />"slay the idolators where ever ye find them..")</span><br><br />We live in troubled times. Globally, a violent ideology of Jihad, firmly rooted in the central tenets of Islamic theology, and carried out throughout Islam's history, is inflicting violence upon non-muslims. Whether such attacks happen in New York, Beslan, London, Mumbai or elsewhere, the underlying ideology is the same. It is called "Jihad fi sabilallah" - Total War on infidels, in the name of Allah.<br /><span class="fullpost"><br />Some nations have recognized where this ideology comes from, and they call a spade a spade. Other countries, such as India, refuse to recognize this threat, mostly for reasons of political gains by certain political parties. They deliberately obfuscate the plain facts by making ridiculous statements like "terrorists have no religion" etc. Unfortunately, they do. That religion is Islam, and in particular a radical, orthodox version of it. <br /><br />There are truly decent and peace loving muslims, many of whom I am privileged to know. This blog has nothing but love and sympathy for them. But orthodox Islam <em><span style="font-weight:bold;">as an ideology</span></em> is not peace loving and does not permit peaceful co-existence with other religions. Orthodox Islam seeks to extinguish all other religious beliefs and replace them with Islam. And as long as even a small minority of muslims take their religion's core ideology seriously, there will be jihad upon non-muslims, because Jihad upon non-muslims is a pillar of Islam, and what allowed Islam to spread so rapidly in the first place. This is a problem not only for non-muslims, but also for muslims who are continually ashamed by the violent actions of their co-religionists.<br /><br />The purpose of this blog is to do some straight talking. The people who attack us have been taught to hate us <em><span style="font-weight:bold;">for no reason other than that we are Hindus.</span></em> In their thinking, based upon the Kuran and Hadith, Hindus are the worst type of unbelievers (infidels), offenders against Allah, whom Allah himself hates so much that he will use them as fuel for the fires of Hell. These Hindus are hated idolators and polytheists about whom the Kuran and Hadith are very clear: their men must be murdered, their women and children enslaved, and their temples destroyed. <br /><br />This is not just my opinion, but that of all the 4 schools of sunni Islam - the Shafi, Hanafi, Hanbali, and Maliki. 3 of these 4 schools say that the choice to be put before Hindus is simply "convert to Islam or die." Only one - Hanafi - allows Hindus the right to live, but as third class citizens. I say "third class" with good reason - the second class citizens would be the 2 "people of the book" - Christians and Jews. But at least we would be allowed to live, for the time being. The idea is to make life so difficult that with time no hindu would chose to remain Hindu, and all would convert. And this is the most liberal of the 4 schools of sunni Islam! Let me repeat that the other 3 schools emphatically state that Hindus have no right to live. <br /><br />These are plain facts. Obfuscating them, or wishing them away, won't solve the problem. We Hindus must be aware of these facts. Truth must always be told, not hidden.<br /><br />We stress that we have nothing against muslims. We only wish to understand the current Jihad upon Hindus in particular, and all non-muslims in general, in light of (a) the theology of Islam and (b) the history of Islam in the Indian subcontinent, which closely follows the theology of Islam. Through the centuries of Islamic rule, millions of Hindus were murdered, millions of Hindu women were enslaved, and all this is in accordance with the Kuran and Hadith. Once again, this is not my opinion, but that of all 4 schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Even today, Pakistan's Islamic party - the Jamaat-i-Islami says that <a href="http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-do-jihadis-want-in-their-own-words.html">if India is conquered, all Hindus will be enslaved, and all Pakistanis will get Hindu slaves</a>. This same party provided the religious justification of the genocide of 2 million Hindus in the 1971 war of Bangladeshi liberation based on orthodox Islamic teachings. It is the largest Islamist party of the subcontinent, and when it holds views that justify large scale genocide and enslavement of Hindus, and are fully rooted in Islamic theology, then we Hindus have reason to be very worried.<br /><br />The other reason that I decided to write this blog is that even 1300 years after the first encounter of Hindus with Jihad, and losing 50-80 million Hindus to this murderous ideology, by and large Hindus have not equated the actions of Islam with Islamic ideology. Instead, we still "examine the effects" rather than the causes. Hindus still wonder why muslims in large groups tend to be so intolerant, violent, and predatory towards other faiths. Well, my dear Hindus, it is because those are the central teachings of Islam! As per Islam, Jihad is "Fard Kifayya", which means a communal obligation. Every society of muslims is obliged to wage continuous war (Jihad) upon its neighbouring Kafir lands in order to "subdue them" and bring them under the fold of Islam. When viewed this way, Pakistan's obsessive hatred and violence upon India is not unnatural, it is purely religious. <br /> <br />So then what is the way out? Firstly, Hindus must be at least somewhat aware of what Islamic scriptures say about them and other Kafirs. Let us begin there. Let us understand Islamist ideology, especially when they themselves tell us in no uncertain terms why they hate us. Let us not be fooled into thinking this is about Kashmir or about anything other than our Hindu Dharma. As long as we are Hindus, Islam will wage Jihad upon us using every means at its disposal. Kashmir is the current excuse. Tomorrow, it will be Junagad and Hyderabad (the Islamists have already told us this). The day after, all of Bharat. Islamist violence upon Hindus and India will not cease till we have all been converted to Islam. That's just what is written in the Kuran and Hadith - I didn't make that up. Read these documents. <br /><br />Here is a very sad fact - Islam does not accord Hindus and Hindu Dharma the right to exist. Please read that again - Islam does not give us the right to live as Hindus. The next time you speak to a "moderate muslim", ask him this question - "Does your religion allow me - an idol worshipping Hindu - the right to live?" If he says "Yes", point out to him that 3 of the 4 schools of Sunni Islam disagree. They say categorically that Hindus must be put to death if they refuse to convert to Islam since Allah wants to extinguish all idol worship from this earth, and muslims have the express orders from him to carry out this death sentence. <br /><br />This ideology of extermination of idolators and their religions is at the very core of Islam. Islam defines itself in these terms. We Hindus ignore this at our own peril. The purpose of this blog is simply to educate Hindus about the plain facts, not to create hatred.<br /><br />I end with the words of Alain Danielou, from his <span style="font-style:italic;">Histoire de la Inde</span> : <blockquote><br />"From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoilations, destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilisations, wiped out entire races." </blockquote><br /><br /><br /></span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-62772980843317267132009-03-20T09:04:00.002+05:302009-03-20T09:12:10.441+05:30I will update blog by end of MarchDear Readers,<br /><br />I will be away from writing for a few days (not sure how long, but surely no later than till March end).<br /><br />Our blog (yes, it is OUR blog, not mine. Readers own a blog) has been doing quite well. We average about 400 hits a day now. <br /><br />I expect to write a few decent pieces upon my return.<br /><br />Stay well. <br /><br /><br /><span class="fullpost"><br /><br /><br /><br /></span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-54224006971779760312009-03-17T11:09:00.003+05:302009-03-17T11:27:09.635+05:30Yes, Islam IS different!I am tired of people who know nothing about any religion state, almost as a self-evident axiom, that "All religions are the same." No they're not! <br /><br />Islam is VERY different from Hindu Dharma. Let's talk statistics for a while, shall we? Can you guys guess what percentage of the verses in the Kuran speak of Kafirs? 63%! In other words, more than half the Kuran is simply hate speech about Kafirs. More than half! There is not one good thing Muhammad had to say about Kafirs. The Sira (his biography and collection of quotes and anecdotes) is more than 85% about his battles with Kafirs. <br /><br />Islam IS about Kafirs. Get that right - Islam as a religion is about one topic alone - Kafirs. And we are all Kafirs. Yes, that's right. We are what Islam is about. The only problem is that Islam does not say "Love these guys." It says "hate them, kill them, behead them, humiliate them, "subdue" them, make them pay taxes, convert them..." Islam is all about "them" - the "them" being us Kafirs. <br /><br /> Islam is not a religion that focuses on itself and its people. It focuses on Kafirs. Isn't that strange - that a religion should focus not on itself but on those who are not in it? Islam is all about "the evil others - the Kafirs." The Kafirs who allowed Muhammad to do his thing when they could have killed him. But they showed great tolerance and let him mock and abuse them. But when he became powerful, he simply killed them or forcibly converted them to Islam. <br /><br />Read the Upanishads (which form the spiritual core of Hindu Dharma). They don't even talk about "us" or "them." They simply discuss how the Atman (roughly translated to 'soul') is related to the unity underlying all creation (called the 'brahman'). There is absolutely no sectarian language there. No wonder Hindus, to this day, are unable to fully fathom this hateful ideology called Islam.<br /><br />The Kuran is a manual of hatred and violence which seeks to divide humanity into "muslims" and "kafirs" and recommends permanent warfare between them. No wonder muslims are unable to live peacefully with any other community, anywhere. Because their religion only speaks of cultivating hatred towards others. <br /><br />The world must no longer keep silent about this ideology. We must call it for what it is. Enough of the political correctness. Enough of the deafening silence. Islam declared war on us 1400 years ago. It is time we at least asked "Why?" Why are you killing us? What have we done? Just because an arab man 1400 years ago said you must kill us? Is that reason enough to abandon all humanity, all rationality?Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-37159098516623909952009-03-17T10:19:00.005+05:302009-03-17T10:27:01.769+05:30Boys also victims of acid attacks in IslamIt seems it is not only women who are victims of acid attacks in Islam. Boys who refuse the sexual advances of Islamic clerics in mosques may also be attacked similarly. I came across <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/1453786/Acid-attack-on-boy-who-refused-sex-with-Muslim-cleric.html">this story</a> from 2004, in the UK Telegraph. <br /><br />Headline: Acid attack on boy who 'refused sex with Muslim cleric'<br /><br />Mosques are the delivery points of hatred in Islam. The Friday weekly dose of hatred for Kafirs comes from mosques. Hindus living near mosques in India will testify that they cower in fear when the crowd comes out of the mosque after receiving their Friday hate sermon. <br /><br />Please google "undercover mosque" for a video of what is taught in the largest mosque in the UK (and elsewhere). I also have a post on that program. <br /><br />The more I think about it, the more I wonder why the heck are we all so silent about Islam? Why aren't more people speaking up? I want all my readers to think about this. What is the right thing to do today? To keep silent about all this? About the Taliban and Saudi Arabia? About Pakistan's terror factories and acid attacks? About Somalia's Shabab terrorists? About Sudan's Islamic militias and their mass rapes? <br /><br />Or to speak up? PLEASE SPEAK UP!Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-22349629736768961502009-03-16T06:47:00.005+05:302009-03-16T07:11:13.795+05:30Islamic turbulence hits BritainThis post is aimed mostly at my Indian readers who may not be aware of the latest goings on in Britain where the increasingly aggressive Islamist community is acting with scant regard for the sentiments of the local populace. This community is almost entirely comprised of Pakistani Muslims. As per orthodox Islamic teachings, these people have no sense of love or belonging towards the land which nurtured them, and instead hate Britain as a "dar-ul-Harb" (land of war, which must be conquered for Islam by Jihad). I ask my readers to click on all the hyperlinks, since they will cover a fair bit of reporting on this growing menace. <br /><br /><span class="fullpost"><br /><br />A couple of days ago, a returning regiment of British troops from Iraq was greeted with <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/4991313/Lutons-Muslim-extremists-defy-public-anger.html">abuse at their homecoming parade</a>. The person leading this abuse was Pakistani cleric Anjem Chaudhury, who, after <a href="http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2009/03/swilling-beer-smoking-dope-and-leering.html">having bedded innumerable British lasses</a>, is now a full fledged Islamic fundamentalist who wants to put his former sexual conquests under Burkhas (I guess he has had his full). This happens to all Pakistani playboys - they suddenly become all holy once they have had enough "uncovered meat" as Islamic clerics describe western women. Another notable Islamic hypocrite was Imran Khan, who, after having lived the life of a playboy in the West for years, suddenly started talking of how the Islamic way of life was superior to the "decadent West." <br /><br />Anyway, Anjem "Andy" Chaudhary says (entirely in accordance with Islam again), that killing Kafirs, even civilians, is Halal (Islamic). He says, again in accordance with the Kuran and Hadith, that there is no such thing as an "innocent Kafir" because all Kafirs have committed the gravest sin by rejecting Islam, and are therefore anything but innocent. The only innocent people are Muslims. Here is an interview:<br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/maHSOB2RFm4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/maHSOB2RFm4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />There are a few British blogs dedicated to the resistance to the increasing Islamic aggression in Britain. I quote from <a href="http://holywarinluton.blogspot.com/">one of them</a>: <br /><br /><blockquote>I have lived in and around Luton my whole life so know exactly how bad the situation is on the ground with the Muslim community. The majority of the Muslims in Luton are second and third generation British born Pakistani's, exactly the same as three of the 7/7 suicidal maniacs. The <span style="font-weight:bold;">Pakistani Muslims</span> control the supply of hard drugs - heroin & crack cocaine. This is a highly lucrative business for them and also fits Al Qaeda's agenda of destroying Britain. Al Qaeda have outlined for the Muslims in Britain to use street drugs against us under the title 'chemical warfare'.<br /><br />In Luton the Pakistani Muslims are working to Al Qaeda's strategy and it is destroying lives, destroying the community and making them vast amounts of money in the process. They have controlled the supply of Heroin for many years and in the process have created an army of Pakistani Muslim youths connected to the trade who are highly organised, heavily armed and extremely wealthy. The non-Muslim community lives with the knowledge of this army of Muslim criminal/terrorists surrounding them and leaves them living under their dominance through fear and intimidation. The non-Muslim community can say nothing and do nothing against the Pakistani Muslim community because of fear of the consequences. If you have trouble with one, then you potentially have trouble with a very large number. The different age groups are built up into different gangs who are all connected and who control the drugs trade, along with all other associated high profit crime, like prostitution and fraud. The criminal element of the Pakistani Muslim community conduct themselves as a paramilitary organisation which leaves the rest of the community having to live as 'Dhimmis' through fear. </blockquote><br /><br />I think any Hindu living in an area where Islam is in a majority or significant minority will echo similar sentiments. I lived in one such locality for years. Every time India lost to Pakistan in a cricket game, I would hear crackers and cheering. Go to old Delhi and verify this for yourself. Or go to the old city of Hyderabad. See for yourself. Again, this is exactly as per Islamic teachings - Islam clearly says that a brother who may not be a Muslim is your enemy, but every Muslim is your brother. Islam respects no bond other than that of the Muslim Ummah. When a Hindu points this out, he is quickly branded "communal", but this is actually taught in the curriculum at Dar-ul-Uloom at Deoband. No one dares question this sedition. Incidentally, the Taliban follow Deobandi Islam. <br /><br />Back to the situation in Britain. For years, the Hindu community there has felt insecure due to the aggression of muslims. Read <a href="http://www.hvk.org/articles/0601/42.html">this article</a> for a report on some earlier tensions. Read <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23386539-details/Police+protect+girls+forced+to+convert+to+Islam/article.do">this article</a> for aggressive conversions forced upon Hindu and Sikh girls in Britain. <br /><br />Look, let me be very clear. Islam's core teachings simply do NOT allow its orthodox adherents to live peacefully with Kafirs. Hatred for Kafirs, and planned violence against them is core to Islam, and the life and teachings of Muhammad. It is Muhammad's core message. So I am never surprised when these events start unfolding whenever Islam reaches a certain critical mass. It has done that in England. The Tube attacks on 7/7 were just the beginning - and I am not saying this, all the Islamists of Britain are. Don't believe me, but do believe them. <br /><br />To my British readers - we Hindus face the same problems. Let us join hands, let us build bridges, let us fight this menace together. When the Jihadis attacked Mumbai, they killed many Indians, but also wanted British and American hostages. And they wanted Israelis dead. We are in this war together - we didn't chose to be, Islam chose it for us. Because we are fellow Kafirs whom Islam has slated for extermination. <br /><br /><br /><br /></span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5395022485886659276.post-33026111564570908562009-03-16T06:27:00.004+05:302009-03-16T08:13:48.095+05:30Islam in action - Acid attacks on women<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NA98U0Csers&hl=zh_TW&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NA98U0Csers&hl=zh_TW&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />We hear this often - acid attacks on women in Islamic societies. It happens in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir, Sudan etc. - the only thing common to these places is they are Islamic societies in the grip of fundamentalist Islamists (i.e., practising Muslims). The problem is this - Islam simply does not regard women are fully human. They are property, and a man can do anything to property. This is reflected by the terrible state of women throughout Islam. I have always stated clearly that women are the primary reason why it is unethical to keep quiet about Islam. Islam dehumanizes women. And the world keeps silent. I won't. <br /><span class="fullpost"><br /><br />If you want to see what pure unadulterated Islam does to women, look at the Taliban. That is pure Islam. 7th century Islam, the way Muhammad intended it to be. Look at the bastion of pure Islam - Saudi Arabia. There, a woman may not leave her home alone, may not drive, may not be in the company of a man who is not her "possessor" (i.e., father, brother, or husband). This should not surprise you, because after all, as per Islam, woman is property, with little to no independence and rights. <br /><br />While the Islamic apologists say that the condition of women in pre-Islamic arabia (before Muhammad) was bad, there seems to be no historical evidence to support this. All traces of pre-Islamic arab culture was destroyed by Islam, so how do we know? Had Islam destroyed Hindu civilization as they had intended, do you think they would not say similar things about Hindus? Of course they would. The dead have no way to state their defence, and pre-Islamic arab culture is totally dead, with nary a trace left. <br /><br />So let us look at what little evidence we do have of the position of women. The biggest piece of evidence is that Muhammad's first wife - Khadijah - was a wealthy businessWOMAN, and ran her own trading business. Muhammad was her employee for a few years, before SHE PROPOSED TO HIM. She was also much older. Now these 3 (businesswoman, herself proposed to a man, man was younger) suggest that women were perhaps pretty respected in pre-Islamic society. Another piece of evidence is that one of the poets Muhammad ordered assassinated - Asma - was a woman. She was writing poetry critical of Muhammad, and he had her killed. Again a woman in an influential position that is rare in Islamic societies. <br /><br /><br />I for one do not believe the Islamic position that pre-Islamic women were in a bad way and Muhammad "reformed" arabia. All the evidence in the Hadith is that Muhammad's band of warriors only destroyed the "Dharma" (way of life) of the arabs. Remember the <a href="http://dharmaveer.blogspot.com/2009/03/except-those-captives-whom-your-right.html">Hadith where muslim soldiers are reluctant to rape captured Kafir arab women in the presence of their husbands?</a> That shows at least some morality. And what did Muhammad do? He immediately "revealed" a verse from Allah saying it was OK to rape these women! Is this the work of a reformer, or a person who destroys morality and culture? You be the judge.<br /><br /></span>Dharmaveerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05160016789053785947noreply@blogger.com