Friday, April 26, 2013
A Hindu student at Brown University, who had been missing since March, and who, tragically, has been found deceased yesterday, was DELIBERATELY made the target of a malicious twitter campaign by,..., no prizes for guess...you guessed it...muslims.
These sick people tried to tie Sunil to the Boston bombing. The lengths to which these people go.
I am glad Sunil's name has been cleared. I am also very sad that he is no more. May he rest in peace.
We are with you. And all of us as GLAD you caught those bastards. Give 'em hell!
And when these things happen to us, remember who your friends are (hint: it's not those guys who hid Bin Laden 800 feet from their West Point).
Its us against Islam, and you better believe it.
Islam is the only "religion" (read death-cult) that actually has a strict set of laws in its Kuran-Hadith hate-literature that specifies how non-muslims are to be treated once muslims form an Islamic society. In two words "like shit."
A few days back, another batch of helpless Hindus from Pakistan arrived in India. They describe their ordeal. Their daughters are routinely grabbed at gunpoint, converted to Islam, and married to muslim men. Oh, btw, they are only emulating the behaviour of their "prophet", so don't blame them.
Life in Pak not worth it, say Sindh Hindus
Excerpt: Recalling a horrific incident that took place recently, a weeping Lakshmi said: “It was evening time and four Muslim men barged into my friend and neighbour’s house as they wanted to kidnap her 12-year-old daughter. When the girl’s mother and I resisted, they put a gun to our heads and threatened to kill us if we did not let go of the child. Then they did what they had to do. We were helpless.” Read the full article on the Daily Pioneer by clicking on the link or copy-pasting the URL. Please send to all humans---by that I mean anyone that feels the pain of a mother and father who have to see their 12 year old daughter being taken away, into a life of Islamic slavery, by gun-toting muslims (who are only following their prophet's example).
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Let us all honour her memory, and pray for her peace. Always remember: women are Islam's first victims. Islam is a male-dominated cult. As such, it views women (both its own, and those of the kafirs) as not much more than property of men. And when men are raised in such an environment, they cannot countenance their "property" speaking back to them, defying them, asserting itself. When they see this, they react in the manner that Fakhra Yunus experienced.
For an hour or so after I read the story of Fakhra, I was truly numb. Then I thought that the least I can do is post this blog in her memory. Fakhra, you were truly brave. You will not be forgotten. You rose above that society that did this to you, and you became immortal. Your pain and suffering will not be in vain. May you rest in peace in those higher abodes where none of the suffering that you experienced in this life will follow.
As a mark of respect, I am not posting any pictures on this article. Readers of this blog will remember Fakhra as a young, extremely beautiful woman, full of life and spirit. Continue Reading...
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
In the past few months alone, 96 Hindus, mostly young girls, have been abducted in muslim Pakistan, converted, and married to local muslim boys. The latest is a 17 year old girl called Rinkle Kumari. Her story has also been carried by the BBC, which you can read here
But the best coverage is by the blogger Hindu existence. Please read the story (with more pictures) here:
Look at the photograph of poor young Rinkle covered in an Islamic burkha.
If you are ANY human being, and your blood does not boil when you read this, then there is something seriously wrong.
Islam is dangerous. It pretends to be all nice and "beautiful" while they are in a small minority. Once they are in majority, the first thing that happens, always, is that Kafir women start "disappearing".
The time to stop Islam is NOW!! Please do not delay in your own conviction, and your own action. We must all unite and stop Islam.
I ask all my readers: please forward news about this young girl Rinkle to at least one other person. I don't care if you forward my blog link,or the BBC link, or whatever, just do it. That is the least we can do.
To my American readers: these Pakistanis are the same ungrateful people who hid Osama in their backyard, all the while fooling you with canards such as "he has kidney failure, he is probably dead by now" etc. To my British readers: we are in this together. These are the same people who were running a flesh ring with young British girls in Britain! Unless we stop looking the other way, Islam will continue victimizing young "Kafir" women. Continue Reading...
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
When I began studying Islam about 10 years ago, I did so with the honest intent of finding something spiritual there. As a devout Hindu, I believe that no one path can lay exclusive claim to the truth, and that the search for truth is ever ongoing. In that spirit, I wished to read about other religions as well.
What I found was that Islam is not exactly a religion in the way we understand it. It is a political system that was invented by one man - Mohammed. Why did he claim it was a religion (and all that baloney about being in touch with "Allah")? Upon a careful reading of the Kuran and Hadith, it becomes clear that Mohammed was like any other charlatan claiming an exclusive relationship with God. He was neither the first charlatan to claim this, nor the last. In the past few decades itself, we saw many "mini-Mohammeds". There was this guy called David Koresh in Texas (USA) who made similar claims. He too was having sexual relationships with many women, including several very young women. The only difference between him and Mohammed is that he (David Koresh) lived in an age where he could not get away with it. The FBI attacked his compound where he was practising Mohammed-like things, and he was killed. In Mohammed's time, a few desperadoes could impose this new "religion" called Islam upon many unsuspecting arabs, at the threat of death. That is the ONLY difference between these two charlatans.
Anyway, when you view this video, keep in mind one thing. Would God - who has the entire universe to worry about - be bothered to send verse after verse covering for Mohammed's sexual misdeeds? Would God send verses allowing Mohammed to bed any "believing woman who offers herself", and at the same time threaten Mohammed's wives with dire consequences if they indulged in adultery? What kind of "God" is this Allah, anyway? The answer is - Allah is not God. Allah is just the ventriloquist dummy of a charlatan named Mohammed. You see, this charlatan never had any spiritual experiences. He made up this whole act. It is absolutely clear that this is the case when you read the Kuran and Hadith.
The happy ending for Mohammed was that he had a LOT of sex (66 women in total, not bad for a bedouin camel hearder), and a LOT of power. His henchmen murdered men and women who so much as uttered any doubt about Mohammed's "prophethood."
Anyway, enjoy the video.
Monday, November 22, 2010
In another post, we have seen how the "prophet" Mohammed was obsessed with the most trite of things. He liked to give lessons on how to urinate (sitting or standing), for example. This should not surprise anyone. Islam is a total mind control cult, and such cults always try to control every little detail of a person's life, thereby turning the person into an automaton who will do whatever the cult leader (Mohammed) wants without questioning.
Anyway, let us observe this phenomenon again. In this case, Mohammed spends Hadith after Hadith on the profound issue of farting. I kid you not. I will reproduce the Hadith, from no less a Hadith collection than Sahih Bukhari - the most reliable Hadith collection.
Let us start.
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 137:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "The prayer of a person who does ,Hadath (passes, urine, stool or wind) is not accepted till he performs (repeats) the ablution." A person from Hadaramout asked Abu Huraira, "What is 'Hadath'?" Abu Huraira replied, " 'Hadath' means the passing of wind from the anus."
So it seems that farting renders a muslim's prayer null and void. Let us continue.
My uncle asked Allah's Apostle about a person who imagined to have passed wind during the prayer. Allah' Apostle replied: "He should not leave his prayers unless he hears sound or smells something."
So one should constantly apply the smell test during prayer to ensure that other muslims are not farting!
Allah's Apostle said, "The angels keep on asking Allah's forgiveness for anyone of you, as long as he is at his Mu,salla (praying place) and he does not pass wind (Hadath). They say, 'O Allah! Forgive him, O Allah! be Merciful to him."
The Prophet said, "Allah does not accept prayer of anyone of you if he does Hadath (passes wind) till he performs the ablution (anew)."
Reading the Hadith convinced me of one thing - Islam is simply not a religion. It has no spiritual core. It is just the nonsensical, hateful, and sexist ramblings of a semi-illiterate 7th century bedouin who used the oldest trick in the book to get the power and women that he would never have had otherwise.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Those who have no understanding of Islam keep asserting that muslims and Hindus both can and should be Indians first. Indeed, most Hindus would not disagree with being Indians first. But what about muslims? Islam does not permit allegiance to any state besides an Islamic state. Indeed, it makes it the duty of all muslims to try and convert their existing state into an Islamic state, by means of war or any other means at their disposal. Islam permits allegiance only to the muslim "ummah", nothing else.
I found a very clear statement to this effect in the readers comments section of the following news:
I reproduce below the muslim reader's comment.
I ask my Hindu readers to stop their idiotic insistence that Islam behave in a "secular manner." India's secularism is a sham upon Hindus only. It is a one way street, with Hindus asked to completely deracinate themselves, deny their Hinduness, while the other side is not only encouraged to assert their Islamic identity, but even pampered when they do so. Wasn't it our Prime Minister who recently said that "Muslims have the first right to India's resources." Can you imagine what a furore it would cause if an Indian PM had said "Hindus have the first right to India's resources." And can you even imagine a muslim PM in a muslim country saying about any minority group that it had the first rights to that country's resources? Hindus are living in fool's paradise. Muslims (as a community) are living by their Kuran. Sure, there are exceptions, but as a community we should not expect them to suddenly forsake the primary diktats of their religion and say "muslim-kafir bhai bhai." Continue Reading...
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
The licentious and depraved sexual behaviour of the "prophet of Islam" is a matter that shames many muslims (those that are aware of it - many are not). This blog post is about a courageous publisher who was killed for the "blasphemous act" of simply reproducing Hadith that describe this shocking sexual depravity by the "prophet" of Islam.
In 1927, a Hindu (Arya Samaji) publisher named Raj Pal published a book titled "Rangeela Rasul" (the debauched prophet) in the Punjab province of the then undivided India. The book contained material from the Hadith, Sira, Tabari etc. (all Islamic sources) that showed just what kind of sexual licentiousness Islam's founder indulged in.
At that time, Punjab had a muslim majority population, and Raj Pal's act was indeed a very courageous and daring one. As per all schools of Islam, the punishment for a person who insults the Prophet Mohammed is death. Accordingly, many attempts were made on his life by practicing muslims, and after many such failed attempts, he was murdered by a practicing muslim named Ilm Din in 1929. Ilm Din, through this act of murder in accordance with Islamic tradition, became a hero to fellow muslims, and a "ghazi" (a killer of Kafirs).
(This preceded the similar murder of Theo Van Gogh in the Netherlands by several decades.)
Many instances of Mohammed's debauched behaviour are described in the book.
In another post, we have already discussed the "prophet" Mohammed's proclivity to kill men and rape their wives (sometimes on that very day). There is much more evidence in the Hadith and Sira that Mohammed was quite a sex maniac. Not only did he go on a marrying spree after this wealthy and influential first wife Khadija died, he acquired many sexual slaves (concubines) through the numerous Jihads on the hapless polytheists and jews of arabia.
What did he do with his "stable" of wives and concubines? The Hadith record his sexual acts with quite some pride. I reproduce some of the relevant Hadith below. All are from Hadith Sahih Bukhari - considered the most authentic and reliable Hadith collection. They describe what we could refer to as Mohammed's "sexual olympics".
Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:
Anas bin Malik said, "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men)." And Sa'id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven).
Note the pride with which the early muslims viewed their "prophet's" sexual prowess. It also speaks volumes about the kind of people who had gathered around Mohammed. Most decent people would view this kind of behavior (not to mention the very fact of having so many wives) with some disgust. But not the early muslims. Why? Reading the Hadith and Sira, it becomes quite clear that the people who had gathered around Mohammed were largely the scoundrels of arab society. Many had been drawn by the lure of war booty and sexual slaves that Mohammed would pass them after his raids on polytheists and jews. Just like criminals often rave about how bloodthirsty their godfather is, the early muslims raved about their "prophet's" sexual prowess. Read on.
Volume 1, Book 5, Number 270:
Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Muntathir:
on the authority of his father that he had asked 'Aisha about the saying of Ibn 'Umar(i.e. he did not like to be a Muhrim while the smell of scent was still coming from his body). 'Aisha said, "I scented Allah's Apostle and he went round (had sexual intercourse with) all his wives, and in the morning he was Muhrim (after taking a bath)."
Volume 1, Book 5, Number 282:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
The Prophet used to visit all his wives in one night and he had nine wives at that time.
It seems Mohammed and Aisha were quite the steamy couple. Try hard as she might, she could not get his semen off his clothes. Read on.
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:
I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:
Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:
I asked 'Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. "
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun:
I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that 'Aisha had said, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:
I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.
Once again, I ask readers to verify every single Hadith for themselves. I have taken all I am not making up a single word in any of the above.
Next we come to the "prophet's" behaviour towards his stable of women when they were having their menstrual period. I reproduce the relevant Hadith, again only from Sahih Bukhari.
The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).
(on the authority of his father) 'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her." 'Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could."
When ever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle any of his wives during the periods (menses), he used to ask her to wear an Izar.
Dedication: I dedicate this blog post to the courageous Shri Raj Pal, and the author of the book Shri Chamupati. You can download the book Rangeela Rasul in Hindi here.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
(An Islamic slave market in the time of Mohammed, where women were traded like animals, usually after being raped by the muslim soldiers who had "captured" them.)
So what kind of a man was this "perfect man?" To answer this question, we must read the Hadith and the Sira, which record even trite details of his life in quite some detail. I started this process about 10 years back. I must confess that I was not at all prepared for what I read. Page after page of the Hadith and Sira show Mohammed to be the following:
"Kinana al-Rabi, who had the custody of the treasure of Banu Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came, to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" He said "Yes". The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr Al-Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what he has." So he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud."
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 143
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
The Prophet said to Abu Talha, "Choose one of your boy servants to serve me in my expedition to Khaibar." So, Abu Talha took me letting me ride behind him while I was a boy nearing the age of puberty. I used to serve Allah's Apostle when he stopped to rest. I heard him saying repeatedly, "O Allah! I seek refuge with You from distress and sorrow, from helplessness and laziness, from miserliness and cowardice, from being heavily in debt and from being overcome by men." Then we reached Khaibar; and when Allah enabled him to conquer the Fort (of Khaibar), the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was described to him. Her husband had been killed while she was a bride. So Allah's Apostle selected her for himself and took her along with him.
When the apostle married Safiya in Khaybar or on the way, she having been beautified and combed, and got in a fit state for the apostle by Umm Sulaym d. Milhan mother of Anas b. Malik, the apostle passed the night with her in a tent of his.
Abu Ayyub, Khalid b. Zayd brother of B. al-Najjar passed the night girt with his sword, guarding the apostle and going round the tent until in the morning the apostle saw him and asked him what he meant by his action. He replied, ‘I was afraid for you with this woman for you have killed her father, her husband, and her people, and till recently she was in unbelief, so I was afraid for you on her account.’ They allege that the apostle said ‘O God, preserve Abu Ayyub as he spent the night preserving me.’
The answer is "Islam."